Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC VERACRUZ V

IMO: 9287924
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 31,797 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.02 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MP THE EDELMAN, MSC VERACRUZ

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,256 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

229

Container median 178 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+6%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

74.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,898 t

CO₂ emitted

59,099 t

Distance sailed

82,535 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,130 h

255 days, 70% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 201 kg/nm · median 177 (+14%)

78.8Ranks 1,283 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 54% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+21%)

7.22Ranks 1,331 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports59%
From the EU30%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,903 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC VERACRUZ V
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC VERACRUZ V
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC VERACRUZ V
Container median

16.018.020.022.024.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	−7%	−1%	+12%	−11%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+8%	+10%	−52%	+17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	−13%	−19%	−53%	−7%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−3%	−8%	−0%	−7%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.6 kn	+4%	−12%	−0%	−1%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	4,154	12,986	20,648	1,515	13.6	201	19.8	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	3,998	12,531	18,418	1,448	12.7	217	22.2	–
2023	not published	7,691	24,099	38,427	3,075	12.5	200	19.0	–
2022	not published	18,898	59,099	82,535	6,130	13.5	229	20.3	–
2021	not published	19,550	61,110	82,541	5,836	14.1	237	21.8	–
2020	not published	18,803	58,728	82,800	4,949	16.7	227	21.9	100%
2018	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	19.8	16.3	+21%	1,331 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	22.2	17.5	+27%	1,232 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	19.0	19.4	−2%	925 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	20.3	19.1	+6%	960 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	21.8	17.9	+22%	1,076 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	21.9	17.6	+25%	1,094 of 1,797	ABS	C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.