Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC TUXPAN V

IMO: 9289972
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 34,395 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.02 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MP THE BRADY, MSC TUXPAN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,395 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

210.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.19

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+18%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

68.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,358 t

CO₂ emitted

32,531 t

33,040 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

49,287 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,618 h

151 days, 41% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 210.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+19%)

78.8Ranks 1,338 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 54% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.19 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+18%)

7.22Ranks 1,296 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports50%
From the EU30%
Into the EU19%
At berth in the EU2%

76% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (24,666 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC TUXPAN V
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC TUXPAN V
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC TUXPAN V
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.9 kn	+26%	+47%	−9%	+4%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+18%	+21%	−2%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−3.0 kn	−29%	−44%	−15%	+2%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−3.0 kn	−17%	−31%	+12%	−3%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−51%	−50%	−36%	−52%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 51%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	10,358	32,531	49,287	3,618	13.6	210.2	19.19	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	9,048	28,554	54,281	4,638	11.7	166.7	18.37	–
2023	not published	7,813	24,622	55,215	4,853	11.4	141.5	23.25	–
2022	not published	12,968	40,609	65,089	4,508	14.4	199.2	22.77	–
2021	not published	13,894	43,430	58,075	3,338	17.4	239.2	23.56	–
2020	not published	44,715	139,545	91,162	5,415	16.8	490.5	48.67	100%
2018	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	19.19	16.30	+18%	1,296 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	18.37	17.52	+5%	1,032 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	23.25	19.40	+20%	1,128 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	22.77	19.13	+19%	1,069 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	23.56	17.90	+32%	1,138 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	48.67	17.58	+177%	1,587 of 1,797	ABS	C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.