Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC TUXPAN V

IMO: 9289972
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 34,395 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.02 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MP THE BRADY, MSC TUXPAN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 31,741 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

239

Container median 186 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

23.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+32%)

Average speed

17.4 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

99.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,894 t

CO₂ emitted

43,430 t

Distance sailed

58,075 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,338 h

139 days, 38% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 210 kg/nm · median 177 (+19%)

78.8Ranks 1,338 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 54% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+18%)

7.22Ranks 1,296 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU79%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

526 t

1.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC TUXPAN V
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC TUXPAN V
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC TUXPAN V
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.9 kn	+26%	+47%	−9%	+4%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+18%	+21%	−2%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−3.0 kn	−29%	−44%	−15%	+2%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−3.0 kn	−17%	−31%	+12%	−3%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−51%	−50%	−36%	−52%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 51%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	10,358	32,531	49,287	3,618	13.6	210	19.2	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	9,048	28,554	54,281	4,638	11.7	167	18.4	–
2023	not published	7,813	24,622	55,215	4,853	11.4	142	23.3	–
2022	not published	12,968	40,609	65,089	4,508	14.4	199	22.8	–
2021	not published	13,894	43,430	58,075	3,338	17.4	239	23.6	–
2020	not published	44,715	139,545	91,162	5,415	16.8	491	48.7	100%
2018	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	19.2	16.3	+18%	1,296 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	18.4	17.5	+5%	1,032 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	23.3	19.4	+20%	1,128 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	22.8	19.1	+19%	1,069 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	23.6	17.9	+32%	1,138 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	48.7	17.6	+177%	1,587 of 1,797	ABS	C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.