Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

SOMBEKE

IMO: 9292113
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 11,270 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.18 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: EXMAR Shipmanagement BV · part of Exmar

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,930 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

102

Gas carrier (LPG) median 88.1 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

26.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 42.5 (−37%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.8 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

35.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,725 t

CO₂ emitted

11,668 t

Distance sailed

36,508 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,538 h

106 days, 29% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 84.6 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+4%)

49.8Ranks 201 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 12.6 (+4%)

8.8Faster than 57% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (−34%)

14.4Ranks 125 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU48%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

209 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SOMBEKE
Gas carrier (LPG) median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SOMBEKE
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SOMBEKE
Gas carrier (LPG) median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	−8%	+0%	+57%	+19%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−10%	−13%	+121%	−18%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−2.0 kn	−0%	−14%	−70%	−10%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+8%	+4%	+588%	−70%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−20%	−16%	−54%	+193%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+13%	+13%	−67%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	−14%	−9%	+375%	−3%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	EXMAR Shipmanagement BV	3,176	9,974	37,562	2,872	13.1	84.6	23.6	–
2024	EXMAR Shipmanagement BV	2,201	6,911	23,966	1,991	12.0	91.8	19.8	–
2023	not published	1,104	3,471	10,863	874	12.4	102	24.2	–
2022	not published	3,725	11,668	36,508	2,538	14.4	102	26.8	–
2021	not published	502	1,568	5,308	354	15.0	94.5	89.1	–
2020	not published	1,374	4,344	11,621	813	14.3	118	30.5	–
2019	not published	3,661	11,494	34,962	2,446	14.3	105	26.4	–
2018	not published	894	2,787	7,366	545	13.5	121	27.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	EXMAR Shipmanagement BV	23.6	35.6	−34%	125 of 355	DNV	B+C
2024	EXMAR Shipmanagement BV	19.8	35.8	−45%	75 of 306	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	24.2	41.8	−42%	96 of 330	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	26.8	42.5	−37%	116 of 348	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	89.1	46.9	+90%	245 of 323	DNV	B
2020	not published	30.5	42.3	−28%	126 of 339	DNV	B
2019	not published	26.4	45.9	−42%	87 of 331	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	27.2	53.1	−49%	75 of 297	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.