Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Exmar
Ships13
CO₂ emitted99 kt+74.1%
Fuel per mile91 kg/nm
Average speed13.5 kn
CO₂ at berth3.9%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentGas carrier (LPG)

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6

  • Exmar26.2 (−26%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Exmar1326.2−26%9113.52,0543.9%–
Segment median 35.60%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
ExmarDNV (13)15%85%100%0%

Exmar: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
WAASMUNSTER9659103Gas carrier (LPG)414 g CO₂/t·nm117+254%13.83,403 t€90k
WARISOULX9659139Gas carrier (LPG)241 g CO₂/t·nm117+106%14.51,873 t€50k
KONTICH9687502Gas carrier (LPG)27.4 g CO₂/t·nm20.9+31%14.66,449 t€176k
KNOKKE9687497Gas carrier (LPG)45.1 g CO₂/t·nm35.4+27%12.18,877 t€265k
KAPELLEN9719290Gas carrier (LPG)26.4 g CO₂/t·nm20.9+26%14.83,752 t€106k
SOMBEKE9292113Gas carrier (LPG)23.6 g CO₂/t·nm20.9+13%13.19,974 t€285k
KAPRIJKE9687485Gas carrier (LPG)23.2 g CO₂/t·nm20.9+11%12.89,477 t€258k
KALLO9719276Gas carrier (LPG)20.5 g CO₂/t·nm20.9−2%12.12,390 t€65k
CHAMPAGNY9983499Gas carrier (LPG)20.5 g CO₂/t·nm20.9−2%14.316,765 t€531k
KOKSIJDE9719305Gas carrier (LPG)30.9 g CO₂/t·nm35.4−13%13.417,778 t€559k
CERRO ALTO EXPLORER9940435Gas carrier (LPG)25.9 g CO₂/t·nm35.4−27%13.26,408 t€181k
FLANDERS PIONEER9897559Gas carrier (LPG)8.1 g CO₂/t·nm14.4−43%14.57,628 t€207k

30 of 13 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.