Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

ALIANCA LEBLON

IMO
9292137
Type
Container ship
Flag (estimated)
Brazil
Port of registry
Rio De Janeiro
Technical efficiency
EEDI 21.67 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
76.2
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
13.7 kn
Fuel per day at sea
25.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
370 t
CO₂ emitted
1,154 t
Distance sailed
4,851 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
353 h
15 days, 4% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2018

Set against all 1,705 container ships with a full-year 2018 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 73.2 kg/nm · median 182 (−60%)
82.0Ranks 90 of 1,705, lowest first313
Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 13.8 (−23%)
8.7Faster than 20% of container ships16.9
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 20.2 (+109%)
8.65Ranks 1,384 of 1,705, lowest first54.4
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU55%
  • Into the EU44%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
370 t
100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
15 t
1.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • ALIANCA LEBLON
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • ALIANCA LEBLON
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020+1.2 kn−12%−4%+58%–1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+1.9 kn+19%+40%−85%–1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published3701,1544,85135313.776.2–100%
2019not published2678313,07324612.586.8–100%
2018not published1,4744,59220,1231,90310.673.242.3100%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published––––ABSC
2019not published––––ABSC
2018not published42.320.2+109%1,384 of 1,705ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.