Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC MIRELLA R

IMO: 9293179
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 24,712 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.63 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SANTA REGULA, MSC MIRELLA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,084 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

231

Container median 174 kg/nm (+33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

24.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+27%)

Average speed

14.2 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

78.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,511 t

CO₂ emitted

48,449 t

Distance sailed

67,130 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,718 h

197 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 227 kg/nm · median 177 (+28%)

78.8Ranks 1,455 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.3 (+16%)

9.1Faster than 81% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+77%)

7.22Ranks 1,660 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU31%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,943 t

4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC MIRELLA R
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC MIRELLA R
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC MIRELLA R
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	−7%	−2%	+26%	+20%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+21%	+20%	+7%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.8 kn	−17%	−26%	−35%	−0%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−5%	−7%	+41%	+25%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.3 kn	+27%	+48%	+2%	+26%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−12%	−11%	−35%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.6 kn	−1%	+34%	+38%	+1%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,552	39,297	55,253	3,598	15.4	227	28.8	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	10,723	33,559	43,796	3,028	14.5	245	24.0	–
2023	not published	8,268	26,126	40,762	2,790	14.6	203	29.2	–
2022	not published	15,231	48,154	62,426	3,815	16.4	244	29.3	–
2021	not published	11,388	36,031	44,270	2,644	16.7	257	23.5	–
2020	not published	8,810	27,848	43,458	3,015	14.4	203	18.6	–
2019	not published	15,511	48,449	67,130	4,718	14.2	231	24.0	–
2018	not published	11,303	35,246	48,518	4,592	10.6	233	23.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	28.8	16.3	+77%	1,660 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	24.0	17.5	+37%	1,291 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	29.2	19.4	+51%	1,331 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	29.3	19.1	+53%	1,283 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	23.5	17.9	+31%	1,133 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	18.6	17.6	+6%	947 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	24.0	18.9	+27%	1,098 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	23.8	20.2	+17%	1,001 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.