Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

JAG LOK

IMO
9293507
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
57,180 t
Flag (estimated)
India
Port of registry
Mumbai
Technical efficiency
EEXI 2.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IB
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 56,921 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
177
Oil tanker median 140 kg/nm (+27%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
9.72
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.86 (+10%)
Average speed
8.7 kn
Oil tanker median 9.8 kn (−11%)
Fuel per day at sea
37.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,390 t
CO₂ emitted
4,346 t
Distance sailed
7,855 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
900 h
38 days, 10% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,797 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 150 kg/nm · median 129 (+16%)
80.4Ranks 1,272 of 1,797, lowest first193
Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 11.0 (+15%)
8.1Faster than 94% of oil tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.23 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.44 (−2%)
4.78Ranks 868 of 1,797, lowest first25.5
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU41%
  • Into the EU48%
  • At berth in the EU11%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
491 t
11.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • JAG LOK
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • JAG LOK
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • JAG LOK
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2022→2023+0.9 kn−7%+1%−36%−24%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2022+3.0 kn−9%+22%+111%+11%3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2023not published1,5904,98010,58383812.61508.23–
2022not published2,6718,35716,5961,42211.716110.8–
2018not published1,3904,3467,8559008.71779.72–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published8.238.44−2%868 of 1,797DNVB+C
2022not published10.88.51+27%1,282 of 1,961DNVC
2018not published9.728.86+10%1,010 of 1,779DNVB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.