Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC NEW HAVEN

IMO
9293777
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
62,459 t
Flag (estimated)
Portugal
Port of registry
Madeira
Technical efficiency
EEXI 11.03 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 54,160 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
246
Container median 165 kg/nm (+49%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
14.4
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−26%)
Average speed
13.0 kn
Container median 13.2 kn (−2%)
Fuel per day at sea
77.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
14,570 t
CO₂ emitted
45,952 t
Distance sailed
59,125 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,533 h
189 days, 52% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 289 kg/nm · median 177 (+63%)
78.8Ranks 1,919 of 2,208, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 13.3 (+9%)
9.1Faster than 69% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−11%)
7.22Ranks 974 of 2,208, lowest first46.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports26%
  • From the EU32%
  • Into the EU38%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,737 t
3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MSC NEW HAVEN
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MSC NEW HAVEN
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MSC NEW HAVEN
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+1.8 kn+3%+17%−45%+6%1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.3 kn+14%+12%−3%−5%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−3.2 kn−19%−35%+21%−2%3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025MSC Shipmanagement Ltd9,11528,52331,5162,17614.528914.5–
2024MSC Shipmanagement Ltd16,14050,33157,2934,49512.728213.6–
2023not published14,57045,95259,1254,53313.024614.4–
2022not published14,87446,91648,7773,01916.230514.7–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025MSC Shipmanagement Ltd14.516.3−11%974 of 2,208DNVB+C
2024MSC Shipmanagement Ltd13.617.5−22%730 of 1,974DNVB+C
2023not published14.419.4−26%697 of 1,899DNVB+C
2022not published14.719.1−23%673 of 1,825DNVC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.