Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC MUNDRA VIII

IMO: 9294989
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 80,739 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.97 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NORTHERN JULIE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 74,055 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

312

Container median 174 kg/nm (+79%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−30%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

110.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,125 t

CO₂ emitted

19,154 t

Distance sailed

19,609 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,334 h

56 days, 15% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 298 kg/nm · median 177 (+68%)

78.8Ranks 1,970 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 74% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−29%)

7.22Ranks 737 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU57%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

301 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC MUNDRA VIII
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC MUNDRA VIII
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC MUNDRA VIII
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.9 kn	+3%	+28%	−80%	+4%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.8 kn	−6%	−28%	−38%	−21%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	+9%	+12%	+40%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	−0.8 kn	+1%	−4%	+144%	+41%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−11%	−2%	−67%	−11%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	832	2,592	2,791	189	14.8	298	11.5	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	3,968	12,425	13,729	1,149	11.9	289	11.1	–
2023	not published	6,840	21,596	22,298	1,416	15.7	307	14.1	–
2022	not published	4,476	14,120	15,950	1,037	15.4	281	16.6	–
2020	not published	1,804	5,618	6,525	402	16.2	277	11.7	–
2019	not published	6,125	19,154	19,609	1,334	14.7	312	13.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	11.5	16.3	−29%	737 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	11.1	17.5	−37%	527 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	14.1	19.4	−28%	684 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	16.6	19.1	−13%	796 of 1,825	DNV	C
2020	not published	11.7	17.6	−33%	492 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	13.2	18.9	−30%	517 of 1,788	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.