Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

CT FRONTIER

IMO: 9296884
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 1,229 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EIV 10.69 g CO₂/t·nm

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,229 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

63.5

Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

161

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.3 (+832%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

156 t

CO₂ emitted

486 t

Distance sailed

2,452 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

201 h

8 days, 2% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,321 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 63.5 kg/nm · median 88.3 (−28%)

57.3Ranks 215 of 1,321, lowest first121

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 10.1 (+21%)

6.3Faster than 85% of chemical tanker ships12.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 161 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.3 (+832%)

9.31Ranks 1,321 of 1,321, lowest first43.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU43%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

9 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019	not published	156	486	2,452	201	12.2	63.5	161	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	161	17.3	+832%	1,321 of 1,321	Korean Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.