Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC BHAVYA V

IMO: 9297876
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 30,825 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.43 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC BHAVYA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,598 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

245

Container median 182 kg/nm (+34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+9%)

Average speed

17.1 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+24%)

Fuel per day at sea

100.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

26,390 t

CO₂ emitted

82,357 t

Distance sailed

107,954 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,311 h

263 days, 72% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 184 kg/nm · median 177 (+4%)

78.8Ranks 1,166 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 13.3 (+7%)

9.1Faster than 63% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+14%)

7.22Ranks 1,267 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU45%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

955 t

1.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC BHAVYA V
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC BHAVYA V
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC BHAVYA V
Container median

14.016.018.020.022.024.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	+7%	+11%	−24%	+32%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+8%	+10%	+48%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−12%	−19%	+106%	−15%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−10%	−12%	−35%	+2%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−5%	−10%	−59%	−4%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.3 kn	−10%	−21%	−24%	−6%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	−4%	+0%	+8%	+0%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	10,059	31,397	54,643	3,858	14.2	184	18.6	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,298	38,345	71,468	5,253	13.6	172	14.1	–
2023	not published	7,695	24,199	48,136	3,624	13.3	160	17.3	–
2022	not published	4,239	13,399	23,346	1,619	14.4	182	20.2	–
2021	not published	7,184	22,692	35,774	2,424	14.8	201	19.8	–
2020	not published	18,607	58,757	88,265	5,627	15.7	211	20.7	–
2019	not published	27,212	84,920	116,359	6,472	18.0	234	22.1	–
2018	not published	26,390	82,357	107,954	6,311	17.1	245	22.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	18.6	16.3	+14%	1,267 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	14.1	17.5	−20%	766 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	17.3	19.4	−11%	836 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	20.2	19.1	+6%	951 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	19.8	17.9	+11%	981 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	20.7	17.6	+18%	1,049 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	22.1	18.9	+17%	1,033 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	22.1	20.2	+9%	943 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.