Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LADY SACHA

IMO
9299460
Type
General cargo ship
Average cargo carried
20,568 t
Flag (estimated)
Barbados
Port of registry
Bridgetown
Former names
FEDERAL MACKINAC, PACIFIC ROSE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Safe Sea Services Sarl

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,998 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
74.1
Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (−14%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
13.1
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+58%)
Average speed
10.4 kn
Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−6%)
Fuel per day at sea
18.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,595 t
CO₂ emitted
5,058 t
Distance sailed
21,533 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,069 h
86 days, 24% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 70.8 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+101%)
17.4Ranks 2,295 of 2,723, lowest first78.8
Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 9.3 (+17%)
6.9Faster than 78% of general cargo ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 10.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−58%)
10.2Ranks 302 of 2,723, lowest first52.7
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports8%
  • From the EU49%
  • Into the EU39%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
1,380 t
87% of all fuel; 14% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
193 t
3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • LADY SACHA
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • LADY SACHA
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • LADY SACHA
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+2.8 kn−10%+21%−38%−49%2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−4.8 kn+14%−29%+172%+2%4.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+1.2 kn−15%−6%−23%−10%1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+3.4 kn−13%+22%+626%−38%3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−2.1 kn+27%+1%−93%+186%2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.3 kn+2%−1%−45%−12%Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+3.2 kn−7%+34%+9%−5%3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Safe Sea Services Sarl9883,12013,9571,27910.970.810.9–
2024part-yearStemship Management Ltd7842,48110,8591,7976.072.223.3–
2024Safe Sea Services Sarl1,7865,64522,6062,7948.179.022.3–
2023not published5771,8208,32264412.969.325.5–
2022not published8812,78010,80492511.781.623.1–
2021not published1404421,4881808.394.037.4–
2020not published1,5955,05821,5332,06910.474.113.187%
2019not published2,8288,92539,0343,63810.772.514.979%
2018not published2,7898,80735,9474,7657.577.615.642%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2025Safe Sea Services Sarl10.825.5−58%302 of 2,723Dromon Bureau of Shipping–
2024part-yearStemship Management Ltd––––Dromon Bureau of ShippingA
2024Safe Sea Services Sarl21.219.3+10%635 of 1,111Dromon Bureau of Shipping–
2023not published20.820.7+1%534 of 1,045Dromon Bureau of ShippingA
2022not published23.18.71+165%3,797 of 3,968Dromon Bureau of ShippingA
2021not published37.48.57+336%3,442 of 3,466Dromon Bureau of ShippingA
2020not published13.18.24+58%2,703 of 3,150ABSC
2019not published14.98.38+77%2,984 of 3,360ABSC
2018not published15.68.50+84%3,022 of 3,384ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.