Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC TORONTO

IMO: 9299525
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 69,377 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.03 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 63,342 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

274

Container median 172 kg/nm (+59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−22%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

96.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,889 t

CO₂ emitted

56,454 t

Distance sailed

65,197 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,460 h

186 days, 51% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 270 kg/nm · median 177 (+53%)

78.8Ranks 1,802 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 13.3 (−5%)

9.1Faster than 38% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−25%)

7.22Ranks 802 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU41%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,535 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC TORONTO
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC TORONTO
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC TORONTO
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+6%	+2%	−25%	−7%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+16%	+15%	+23%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.6 kn	−7%	+6%	+383%	−3%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.5 kn	−16%	−36%	−77%	−4%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+4%	+6%	−27%	+2%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+2%	−2%	−5%	−8%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.6 kn	−11%	−19%	−3%	−6%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	13,241	41,287	48,981	3,899	12.6	270	12.2	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	16,746	52,179	65,386	5,033	13.0	256	13.0	–
2023	not published	11,742	36,598	53,186	4,052	13.1	221	13.1	–
2022	not published	2,618	8,159	11,010	956	11.5	238	13.5	–
2021	not published	13,625	42,965	47,877	3,195	15.0	285	14.0	–
2020	not published	17,889	56,454	65,197	4,460	14.6	274	13.7	–
2019	not published	18,422	57,366	68,686	4,482	15.3	268	14.8	–
2018	not published	21,257	66,205	70,735	4,182	16.9	301	15.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	12.2	16.3	−25%	802 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	13.0	17.5	−26%	687 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	13.1	19.4	−33%	606 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	13.5	19.1	−30%	597 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	14.0	17.9	−22%	627 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.7	17.6	−22%	634 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	14.8	18.9	−22%	645 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	15.8	20.2	−22%	593 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.