Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM NABUCCO

IMO: 9299630
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 65,270 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 77,565 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

210

Container median 172 kg/nm (+22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.52

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−52%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

73.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,530 t

CO₂ emitted

52,135 t

Distance sailed

78,892 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,373 h

224 days, 61% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 259 kg/nm · median 177 (+46%)

78.8Ranks 1,727 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.7 kn · median 13.3 (−35%)

9.1Faster than 8% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−23%)

7.22Ranks 828 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU42%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

16,530 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,247 t

4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM NABUCCO
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM NABUCCO
Container median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM NABUCCO
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2021→2025	−6.3 kn	−8%	−47%	−34%	−16%	6.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+35%	+38%	−74%	+75%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 35%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−13%	−6%	+6%	−13%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+10.1 kn	−9%	+243%	+9,277%	−86%	10.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	3,461	10,927	13,372	1,534	8.7	259	12.5	87%
2021	not published	5,698	17,967	20,159	1,342	15.0	283	14.9	97%
2020	not published	16,530	52,135	78,892	5,373	14.7	210	8.52	100%
2019	not published	17,828	55,698	74,363	5,420	13.7	240	9.84	96%
2018	not published	208	655	793	217	3.6	263	71.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	12.5	16.3	−23%	828 of 2,208	ABS	C
2021	not published	14.9	17.9	−17%	709 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	8.52	17.6	−52%	264 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	9.84	18.9	−48%	306 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	71.4	20.2	+253%	1,627 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.