Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM TOSCA

IMO: 9299783
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 36,775 t
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 50,208 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

292

Container median 182 kg/nm (+61%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−10%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

91.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,481 t

CO₂ emitted

35,848 t

Distance sailed

39,339 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,003 h

125 days, 34% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 255 kg/nm · median 165 (+55%)

77.6Ranks 1,532 of 1,899, lowest first291

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 13.2 (−8%)

10.0Faster than 31% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (−7%)

7.34Ranks 874 of 1,899, lowest first51.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports34%
From the EU31%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,337 t

6.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM TOSCA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM TOSCA
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM TOSCA
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+2.0 kn	−9%	+10%	−91%	+33%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.0 kn	−1%	−30%	−42%	+1%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+22%	+22%	−17%	+29%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−15%	−14%	−19%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	−6%	−0%	+97%	−41%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023LNG / alt.	not published	680	1,766	2,662	219	12.1	255	18.0	94%
2022	not published	8,357	26,363	29,924	2,970	10.1	279	13.5	95%
2021	not published	14,664	46,305	51,803	3,661	14.1	283	13.5	91%
2020	not published	14,576	46,006	62,560	4,452	14.1	233	10.4	100%
2019	not published	21,285	66,489	77,690	5,582	13.9	274	10.7	97%
2018	not published	11,481	35,848	39,339	3,003	13.1	292	18.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG / alt.	not published	18.0	19.4	−7%	874 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	13.5	19.1	−29%	602 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	13.5	17.9	−25%	588 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	10.4	17.6	−41%	412 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	10.7	18.9	−43%	377 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	18.2	20.2	−10%	742 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.