Navalyze · Container · Ship

OOCL ASIA

IMO: 9300790
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 68,584 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EIV 17.21 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 58,503 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

257

Container median 172 kg/nm (+49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−21%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

86.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,698 t

CO₂ emitted

46,317 t

Distance sailed

57,204 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,060 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 285 kg/nm · median 165 (+73%)

77.6Ranks 1,683 of 1,899, lowest first291

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 13.2 (−18%)

10.0Faster than 16% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (−33%)

7.34Ranks 604 of 1,899, lowest first51.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU45%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,533 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

OOCL ASIA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

OOCL ASIA
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

OOCL ASIA
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−2.5 kn	−4%	−22%	−64%	+4%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	−3%	+5%	+214%	+1%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.9 kn	+19%	+3%	−82%	−10%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	−7%	−13%	−29%	−3%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−7%	−10%	−1%	−7%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	3,329	10,455	11,664	1,078	10.8	285	13.1	96%
2022	not published	9,468	29,756	31,969	2,404	13.3	296	12.6	95%
2021	not published	3,110	9,779	10,196	833	12.2	305	12.5	93%
2020	not published	14,698	46,317	57,204	4,060	14.1	257	13.8	–
2019	not published	22,306	70,065	80,853	5,378	15.0	276	14.3	–
2018	not published	24,291	76,228	81,506	5,286	15.4	298	15.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	13.1	19.4	−33%	604 of 1,899	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	12.6	19.1	−34%	524 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	12.5	17.9	−30%	502 of 1,781	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	13.8	17.6	−21%	651 of 1,797	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	14.3	18.9	−24%	595 of 1,788	ABS	–
2018	not published	15.5	20.2	−24%	573 of 1,705	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.