Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

CENGIZ BEY

IMO
9301342
Type
General cargo ship
Flag (estimated)
Barbados
Port of registry
Bridgetown
Technical efficiency
EIV 13.50 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
46.2
General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (−20%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
17.9
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.0 (−28%)
Average speed
9.2 kn
General cargo median 9.7 kn (−5%)
Fuel per day at sea
10.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,753 t
CO₂ emitted
5,489 t
Distance sailed
37,962 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,118 h
172 days, 47% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,167 general cargo ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 41.9 kg/nm · median 55.1 (−24%)
36.0Ranks 247 of 1,167, lowest first90.9
Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)
8.2Faster than 39% of general cargo ships12.9
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 17.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.5 (−30%)
11.3Ranks 242 of 1,167, lowest first48.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports13%
  • From the EU46%
  • Into the EU39%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
74 t
1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CENGIZ BEY
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • CENGIZ BEY
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • CENGIZ BEY
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020+1.0 kn−9%+0%−11%−5%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.7 kn−4%+3%−9%+9%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published1,4174,44433,8003,32910.241.9––
2019not published1,7535,48937,9624,1189.246.2––
2018not published2,0126,29641,7164,8948.548.2––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2020not published17.024.5−30%242 of 1,167Bureau VeritasA
2019not published17.925.0−28%263 of 1,154Bureau VeritasA
2018not published16.424.9−34%219 of 1,044Bureau VeritasA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.