Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM MALTA

IMO: 9301433
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 17,306 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BOMAR CAEN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,213 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

137

Container median 182 kg/nm (−25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

38.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+89%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

43.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,267 t

CO₂ emitted

35,232 t

Distance sailed

82,255 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,182 h

258 days, 71% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 106 kg/nm · median 177 (−40%)

78.8Ranks 590 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.9 kn · median 13.3 (−33%)

9.1Faster than 9% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+17%)

7.22Ranks 1,292 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU35%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

905 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM MALTA
Container median

100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM MALTA
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM MALTA
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.9 kn	−6%	−35%	−52%	−6%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	−1.6 kn	+0%	−11%	+467%	−14%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	−7%	−15%	+123%	+17%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.1 kn	−7%	+8%	−49%	−18%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	−2%	−3%	−85%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−4%	−0%	−13%	−21%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	3,535	11,051	33,414	3,766	8.9	106	19.1	98%
2024	CMA CGM SA	7,746	24,159	68,946	5,391	12.8	112	20.3	96%
2022	not published	1,363	4,246	12,168	843	14.4	112	23.8	–
2021	not published	655	2,040	5,447	346	15.8	120	20.4	–
2020	not published	1,379	4,310	10,719	784	13.7	129	24.9	–
2019	not published	9,402	29,319	71,814	5,189	13.8	131	30.3	–
2018	not published	11,267	35,232	82,255	6,182	13.3	137	38.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	19.1	16.3	+17%	1,292 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	20.3	17.5	+16%	1,145 of 1,974	ABS	C
2022	not published	23.8	19.1	+24%	1,108 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	20.4	17.9	+14%	1,013 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	24.9	17.6	+42%	1,222 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	30.3	18.9	+61%	1,271 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	38.2	20.2	+89%	1,313 of 1,705	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.