Navalyze · Container · Ship

0090 HSL NIKE

IMO: 9301457
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 20,555 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.05 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HSL NIKE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Cosmoship Management S.A.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,295 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

170

Container median 182 kg/nm (−7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+71%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

60.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,128 t

CO₂ emitted

50,255 t

Distance sailed

94,987 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,395 h

266 days, 73% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 124 kg/nm · median 177 (−30%)

78.8Ranks 735 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 13.3 (+7%)

9.1Faster than 64% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+16%)

7.22Ranks 1,278 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports74%
From the EU8%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,432 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

0090 HSL NIKE
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

0090 HSL NIKE
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

0090 HSL NIKE
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.5 kn	−12%	−20%	−38%	−28%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	−16%	−4%	+77%	−32%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−5.9 kn	+3%	−28%	+26%	+37%	5.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+4.2 kn	+16%	+47%	−26%	−12%	4.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+9%	+4%	−48%	+1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.4 kn	−18%	+12%	+6%	−8%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.3 kn	−6%	−27%	−18%	−1%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Cosmoship Management S.A.	5,538	17,344	44,740	3,148	14.2	124	18.9	–
2024	Cosmoship Management S.A.	10,109	31,670	71,666	4,575	15.7	141	26.1	–
2023	not published	6,808	21,401	40,537	2,971	13.6	168	38.2	–
2022	not published	5,231	16,446	32,078	1,647	19.5	163	27.8	–
2021	not published	6,128	19,232	43,426	2,834	15.3	141	31.6	–
2020	not published	10,741	33,595	82,738	5,182	16.0	130	31.3	–
2019	not published	12,378	38,615	77,914	6,720	11.6	159	34.1	–
2018	not published	16,128	50,255	94,987	6,395	14.9	170	34.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Cosmoship Management S.A.	18.9	16.3	+16%	1,278 of 2,208	EMICERT	–
2024	Cosmoship Management S.A.	26.1	17.5	+49%	1,364 of 1,974	EMICERT	A
2023	not published	38.2	19.4	+97%	1,510 of 1,899	EMICERT	A
2022	not published	27.8	19.1	+45%	1,239 of 1,825	EMICERT	A
2021	not published	31.6	17.9	+77%	1,339 of 1,781	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	31.3	17.6	+78%	1,357 of 1,797	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	34.1	18.9	+81%	1,332 of 1,788	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	34.6	20.2	+71%	1,250 of 1,705	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.