Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

HAI GONG YOU 606

IMO
9301873
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
9,043 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.97 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA
Former names
FURE WEST

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Furetank Rederi AB

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,073 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
57.8
Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (−33%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
20.9
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+29%)
Average speed
10.9 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (−4%)
Fuel per day at sea
15.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,825 t
CO₂ emitted
8,229 t
Distance sailed
48,864 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,473 h
186 days, 51% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 69.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−13%)
52.8Ranks 469 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 11.1 (−5%)
8.8Faster than 33% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+60%)
7.93Ranks 1,057 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports61%
  • From the EU9%
  • Into the EU17%
  • At berth in the EU13%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,094 t
13.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • HAI GONG YOU 606
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • HAI GONG YOU 606
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • HAI GONG YOU 606
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.4 kn+2%+6%+3%+0%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.1 kn−3%−3%+11%−14%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023+0.0 kn+7%+6%−11%−3%Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.7 kn+1%+8%−5%+20%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−1.4 kn+11%−3%−26%+15%1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+4.5 kn−5%+62%+24%−6%4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.4 kn−7%−11%−1%−4%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearFuretank Rederi AB1,8605,84827,4872,64810.467.729.447%
2025Wuhan Yidong Shipping Management Co.,Ltd2,3997,54134,7433,31410.569.024.037%
2024Furetank Rederi AB2,2676,94233,5733,31310.167.523.9–
2023not published2,1096,29230,3762,98810.269.427.7–
2022not published2,2237,03434,3053,36010.264.828.6–
2021not published2,3266,99236,1813,7999.564.323.9–
2020LNG / alt.not published2,8258,22948,8644,47310.957.820.9–
2019LNG / alt.not published2,4047,06539,3696,1686.461.022.2–
2018not published2,5937,70039,5965,8566.865.523.1–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearFuretank Rederi AB––––Bureau VeritasC
2025Wuhan Yidong Shipping Management Co.,Ltd24.015.0+60%1,057 of 1,460China Classification SocietyA+B+C
2024Furetank Rederi AB23.916.7+43%875 of 1,274Bureau VeritasC
2023not published27.716.2+71%991 of 1,314Bureau VeritasB+C
2022not published28.616.1+78%1,105 of 1,409Bureau VeritasB+C
2021not published23.916.7+43%950 of 1,343Bureau VeritasB+C
2020LNG / alt.not published20.916.2+29%872 of 1,312Bureau VeritasB+C
2019LNG / alt.not published22.217.3+28%878 of 1,321Bureau VeritasB+C
2018not published23.117.1+34%898 of 1,294Bureau VeritasC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.