Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE HARBOUR

IMO: 9302152
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 63,262 t
Flag (estimated): Panama (from the 2024 report)
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.22 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HARBOUR BRIDGE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 77,899 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

282

Container median 186 kg/nm (+52%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−36%)

Average speed

16.7 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

112.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,660 t

CO₂ emitted

46,279 t

Distance sailed

52,067 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,115 h

130 days, 36% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 215 kg/nm · median 177 (+22%)

78.8Ranks 1,380 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 13.3 (+17%)

9.1Faster than 85% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−35%)

7.22Ranks 638 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU47%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,347 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE HARBOUR
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE HARBOUR
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE HARBOUR
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.0

’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−14%	−10%	−44%	–	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+4%	−2%	+35%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−2%	+1%	−15%	−4%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−12%	−19%	+1%	+2%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2021	−0.1 kn	−10%	−11%	+30%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD	7,237	22,470	33,635	2,155	15.6	215	10.6	0%
2024part-year	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	15,079	47,042	60,296	4,029	15.0	250	–	–
2024	ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD	15,079	47,042	60,296	4,029	15.0	250	–	–
2023	not published	10,758	33,977	44,648	2,804	15.9	241	11.2	–
2022	not published	12,948	40,891	52,485	3,410	15.4	247	11.6	–
2021	not published	14,660	46,279	52,067	3,115	16.7	282	11.4	–
2019	not published	12,588	39,345	40,107	2,392	16.8	314	13.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD	10.6	16.3	−35%	638 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024part-year	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2024	ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	11.2	19.4	−42%	467 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	11.6	19.1	−39%	456 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	11.4	17.9	−36%	429 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.