Navalyze · Container · Ship

S SANTIAGO

IMO: 9302566
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 33,886 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands (from the 2019 report)
Technical efficiency: EIV 17.80 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,439 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

243

Container median 174 kg/nm (+39%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+17%)

Average speed

16.7 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+22%)

Fuel per day at sea

97.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,677 t

CO₂ emitted

55,538 t

Distance sailed

72,904 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,369 h

182 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2021

Set against all 1,781 container ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 218 kg/nm · median 186 (+17%)

80.1Ranks 1,033 of 1,781, lowest first325

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 14.1 (−1%)

10.7Faster than 47% of container ships16.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.9 (+13%)

7.81Ranks 1,004 of 1,781, lowest first50.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU47%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,744 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

S SANTIAGO
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0260.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Average speed, kn

S SANTIAGO
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

S SANTIAGO
Container median

14.016.018.020.022.024.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2020→2021	−2.7 kn	−5%	−20%	−78%	+1%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	−6%	−6%	−5%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+3.0 kn	+16%	+41%	+5%	+46%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2021	not published	3,354	10,525	15,383	1,103	13.9	218	20.2	–
2020	not published	15,847	49,741	69,345	4,190	16.6	229	20.0	–
2019	not published	17,677	55,538	72,904	4,369	16.7	243	22.1	–
2018	not published	14,521	45,302	69,544	5,076	13.7	209	15.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2021	not published	20.2	17.9	+13%	1,004 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	20.0	17.6	+14%	1,024 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	22.1	18.9	+17%	1,035 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	15.2	20.2	−25%	554 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.