Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

ARCHANGEL

IMO: 9302592
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 133,392 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.79 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Tsakos Shipping & Trading S.A. · part of Tsakos

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 59,974 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

205

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (+27%)

Average speed

9.9 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

48.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,212 t

CO₂ emitted

31,969 t

Distance sailed

49,818 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,046 h

210 days, 58% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 196 kg/nm · median 129 (+53%)

76.1Ranks 1,520 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 10.7 (−2%)

8.0Faster than 44% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.62 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−42%)

4.51Ranks 185 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU43%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,663 t

8.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ARCHANGEL
Oil tanker median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ARCHANGEL
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ARCHANGEL
Oil tanker median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	−16%	−8%	−11%	−72%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+14%	+11%	−69%	+53%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+37%	+28%	+155%	+56%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 37%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−8%	−16%	−54%	−6%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.8 kn	−26%	−13%	+93%	−27%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+9%	+11%	+3%	+67%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+5.1 kn	−43%	+22%	+370%	−64%	5.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 43%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Tsakos Shipping & Trading S.A.	2,658	8,344	13,539	1,285	10.5	196	4.62	91%
2024	Tsakos Shipping & Trading S.A.	3,573	11,189	15,257	1,595	9.6	234	16.4	64%
2023	not published	10,212	31,969	49,818	5,046	9.9	205	10.7	–
2022	not published	2,920	9,174	19,531	1,848	10.6	150	6.86	–
2021	not published	6,874	21,489	42,256	3,643	11.6	163	7.31	–
2020	not published	4,845	15,249	21,893	2,224	9.8	221	9.98	–
2019	not published	4,351	13,687	21,352	2,221	9.6	204	5.99	–
2018	not published	1,629	5,115	4,547	1,018	4.5	358	16.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Tsakos Shipping & Trading S.A.	4.62	7.95	−42%	185 of 1,665	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	Tsakos Shipping & Trading S.A.	16.4	8.06	+103%	1,458 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	10.7	8.44	+27%	1,191 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	–
2022	not published	6.86	8.51	−19%	653 of 1,961	Lloyd's Register	–
2021	not published	7.31	8.86	−17%	649 of 1,789	Lloyd's Register	–
2020	not published	9.98	9.03	+11%	1,049 of 1,870	Lloyd's Register	–
2019	not published	5.99	8.83	−32%	424 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	16.8	8.86	+89%	1,453 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.