Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM BEIRA

IMO: 9302956
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 2,022 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: COSMOS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,022 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

73.6 kg/nm

Container median 167.2 kg/nm (−56%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

113

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (+547%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Container median 13.5 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

221 t

CO₂ emitted

688 t

699 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

3,001 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

245 h

10 days, 3% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 73.6 kg/nm · median 167.2 (−56%)

78.9Ranks 132 of 1,974, lowest first301.6

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 13.5 (−9%)

9.6Faster than 31% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 113.37 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (+547%)

7.33Ranks 1,966 of 1,974, lowest first51.62

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU30%
Into the EU69%
At berth in the EU1%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (347 t).

Fuel burned laden

99%

1% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

0.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM BEIRA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM BEIRA
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM BEIRA
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+4.4 kn	−33%	+3%	−52%	+330%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 33%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−6.9 kn	−14%	−54%	−84%	−19%	6.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−3%	−8%	−17%	−48%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	+13%	+18%	−55%	+91%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−7%	−7%	−2%	−28%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.1 kn	+8%	+36%	+47%	+24%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	CMA CGM SA	221	688	3,001	245	12.3	73.6	113.37	99%
2023	not published	679	2,124	6,209	781	7.9	109.3	26.39	–
2022	not published	4,888	15,275	38,329	2,590	14.8	127.5	32.70	–
2021	not published	6,067	18,960	46,132	2,954	15.6	131.5	62.39	–
2020	not published	11,896	37,132	101,857	6,845	14.9	116.8	32.68	–
2019	not published	13,014	40,623	103,721	7,010	14.8	125.5	45.18	–
2018	not published	8,215	25,623	70,472	6,037	11.7	116.6	36.33	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	CMA CGM SA	113.37	17.52	+547%	1,966 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	26.39	19.40	+36%	1,244 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	32.70	19.13	+71%	1,356 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	62.39	17.90	+249%	1,694 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	32.68	17.58	+86%	1,377 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	45.18	18.88	+139%	1,493 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	36.33	20.22	+80%	1,280 of 1,705	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.