Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

GRAND DUKE

IMO: 9303170
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 306 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 306 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

104.5 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 103.3 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

1,064

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.31 (+1,824%)

Average speed

16.7 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,731 t

CO₂ emitted

5,399 t

5,484 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

16,564 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

994 h

41 days, 11% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 335 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 104.5 kg/nm · median 103.3 (+1%)

80.4Ranks 186 of 335, lowest first119.6

Average speedThis ship 16.7 kn · median 14.4 (+16%)

12.3Faster than 96% of vehicle carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 1,063.97 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.31 (+1,824%)

37.69Ranks 335 of 335, lowest first158.40

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU85%
Into the EU4%
At berth in the EU1%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,014 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GRAND DUKE
Vehicle carrier median

100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Average speed, kn

GRAND DUKE
Vehicle carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GRAND DUKE
Vehicle carrier median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2024	+2.3 kn	−16%	−3%	+56%	+2,281%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	+15%	+8%	−65%	−3%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−5%	−4%	−12%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	+9%	+23%	+44%	+3%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	−14%	−20%	+195%	+11%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd.	1,731	5,399	16,564	994	16.7	104.5	1,063.97	–
2022	not published	1,321	4,176	10,617	740	14.4	124.4	44.69	–
2021	not published	3,252	10,281	30,088	1,958	15.4	108.1	46.18	–
2020	not published	3,874	12,237	34,176	2,239	15.3	113.3	58.54	–
2019	not published	2,466	7,733	23,700	1,751	13.5	104.1	56.70	–
2018	not published	975	3,057	8,024	557	14.4	121.5	51.01	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd.	1,063.97	55.31	+1,824%	335 of 335	Korean Register	B
2022	not published	44.69	57.66	−22%	95 of 463	Korean Register	B
2021	not published	46.18	59.57	−22%	91 of 459	Korean Register	B
2020	not published	58.54	57.26	+2%	235 of 449	Korean Register	B
2019	not published	56.70	58.95	−4%	200 of 426	Korean Register	B
2018	not published	51.01	62.35	−18%	88 of 434	Korean Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.