Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd.your view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 22 |
| CO₂ emitted | 180 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 106 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 15.0 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.0% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Vehicle carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.3
- Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd.52.6 (−5% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd. | 21 | 52.6 | −5% | 107 | 15.1 | 1,666 | 2.0% | – |
| Segment median | 55.3 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd.6.1 (−25% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd. | 1 | 6.1 | −25% | 84 | 10.7 | 1,158 | 2.1% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd. | Korean Register (22) | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
Cido Shipping Korea Co., Ltd.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRAND DUKE | 9303170 | Vehicle carrier | 1,064 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +572% | 16.7 | 5,399 t | €90k |
| GRAND VENUS | 9303211 | Vehicle carrier | 446 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +181% | 13.5 | 5,466 t | €88k |
| DREAM ORCHID | 9360568 | Vehicle carrier | 319 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +101% | 16.1 | 3,369 t | €51k |
| GRAND ORION | 9303194 | Vehicle carrier | 91.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 73.3 | +25% | 14.9 | 9,254 t | €115k |
| GOLD ESTRELLA | 9339844 | Vehicle carrier | 86.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 73.3 | +18% | 13.7 | 9,111 t | €143k |
| GRAND AURORA | 9279331 | Vehicle carrier | 52.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 45.6 | +15% | 16.1 | 5,788 t | €84k |
| GRAND SAPPHIRE | 9325233 | Vehicle carrier | 81.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 73.3 | +12% | 15.0 | 3,782 t | €60k |
| GRAND NEPTUNE | 9303209 | Vehicle carrier | 48.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 45.6 | +6% | 15.9 | 17,844 t | €288k |
| GRAND MERCURY | 9247584 | Vehicle carrier | 48.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 45.6 | +5% | 16.1 | 4,536 t | €74k |
| GRAND COSMO | 9303182 | Vehicle carrier | 39.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 38.0 | +3% | 13.6 | 11,612 t | €154k |
| GRAND PIONEER | 9247572 | Vehicle carrier | 47.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 45.6 | +3% | 15.9 | 2,022 t | €28k |
| GRAND HERO | 9339806 | Vehicle carrier | 56.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.3 | +3% | 14.3 | 11,606 t | €175k |
| GRAND DIAMOND | 9303223 | Vehicle carrier | 56.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.3 | +2% | 15.0 | 10,284 t | €159k |
| GRAND PAVO | 9284776 | Vehicle carrier | 52.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.3 | −4% | 15.5 | 12,501 t | €218k |
| GRAND VICTORY | 9334234 | Vehicle carrier | 43.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 45.6 | −6% | 15.4 | 13,479 t | €214k |
| GRAND URANUS | 9472206 | Vehicle carrier | 35.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 38.0 | −6% | 16.2 | 12,594 t | €203k |
| GRAND PHOENIX | 9284764 | Vehicle carrier | 50.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.3 | −8% | 15.5 | 10,210 t | €145k |
| FORTUNE TIGER | 9558282 | Bulk carrier | 6.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.7 | −9% | 10.7 | 3,252 t | €54k |
| GRAND MARK | 9228306 | Vehicle carrier | 41.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 45.6 | −10% | 16.1 | 16,041 t | €256k |
| GRAND LEGACY | 9355240 | Vehicle carrier | 49.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 55.3 | −11% | 15.2 | 3,252 t | €45k |
| DREAM DIVA | 9325790 | Vehicle carrier | 62.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 73.3 | −15% | 13.8 | 4,608 t | €70k |
| GRAND DAHLIA | 9355238 | Vehicle carrier | 30.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 38.0 | −20% | 14.0 | 3,834 t | €50k |
30 of 22 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.