Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

GOOD HOPE MAX

IMO: 9304241
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 45,585 t
Flag (estimated): Isle of Man
Port of registry: Douglas
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.60 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Central Ship Management DMCC

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 51,984 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

120

Bulk carrier median 92.4 kg/nm (+30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.28

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.50 (−14%)

Average speed

8.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.4 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,762 t

CO₂ emitted

11,850 t

Distance sailed

31,312 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,506 h

146 days, 40% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 102 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+23%)

61.0Ranks 2,961 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 10.7 (−10%)

8.8Faster than 19% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.98 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−12%)

4.80Ranks 1,354 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU35%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

2,995 t

80% of all fuel; 20% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

639 t

5.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GOOD HOPE MAX
Bulk carrier median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GOOD HOPE MAX
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GOOD HOPE MAX
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−2%	−2%	+3%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	−38%	−29%	+655%	−66%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 38%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	−3.7 kn	+61%	+12%	−90%	+190%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 61%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−3%	+7%	+192%	+11%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+2%	+27%	−51%	−13%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−12%	−14%	−49%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Central Ship Management DMCC	1,120	3,514	11,397	1,201	9.5	98.3	5.29	–
2025	Enterprises Shipping & Trading	1,809	5,668	17,813	1,857	9.6	102	6.98	14%
2024	Central Ship Management DMCC	1,797	5,612	17,254	1,802	9.6	104	6.51	–
2023	not published	383	1,214	2,286	274	8.3	168	19.1	–
2021	not published	2,393	7,477	22,921	1,916	12.0	104	6.59	76%
2020	not published	845	2,650	7,842	724	10.8	108	5.94	96%
2019	not published	1,707	5,345	16,097	1,850	8.7	106	6.79	69%
2018	not published	3,762	11,850	31,312	3,506	8.9	120	7.28	80%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Central Ship Management DMCC	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2025	Enterprises Shipping & Trading	6.98	7.90	−12%	1,354 of 3,611	ABS	A
2024	Central Ship Management DMCC	6.51	8.09	−20%	896 of 3,089	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	19.1	8.27	+131%	3,257 of 3,548	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2021	not published	6.59	8.57	−23%	825 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	5.94	8.24	−28%	602 of 3,150	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	6.79	8.38	−19%	1,011 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2018	not published	7.28	8.50	−14%	1,161 of 3,384	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.