Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MIAMI

IMO
9304320
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
9,591 t
Flag (estimated)
Tuvalu
Port of registry
Funafuti
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
CELSIUS MIAMI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: RAFFLES SHIPMANAGEMENT SERVICES PTE LTD

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,035 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
68.8
Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (−16%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
14.5
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (−11%)
Average speed
10.3 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−8%)
Fuel per day at sea
16.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
654 t
CO₂ emitted
2,071 t
Distance sailed
9,512 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
927 h
39 days, 11% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 58.8 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−26%)
52.8Ranks 226 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 11.1 (+0%)
8.8Faster than 49% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+29%)
7.93Ranks 918 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU16%
  • Into the EU77%
  • At berth in the EU7%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
150 t
7.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MIAMI
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • MIAMI
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MIAMI
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+1.5 kn−16%−4%+83%+32%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.7 kn+2%−4%+107%+1%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2023−0.5 kn−48%−51%+102%−50%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 48%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025RAFFLES SHIPMANAGEMENT SERVICES PTE LTD2,1176,67235,9873,25511.158.819.3–
2024RAFFLES SHIPMANAGEMENT SERVICES PTE LTD1,3774,36119,6662,0449.670.014.6–
2023not published6542,0719,51292710.368.814.5–
2020not published6271,9574,71743810.813329.0–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025RAFFLES SHIPMANAGEMENT SERVICES PTE LTD19.315.0+29%918 of 1,460DNVA+B
2024RAFFLES SHIPMANAGEMENT SERVICES PTE LTD14.616.7−13%543 of 1,274Bureau VeritasA
2023not published14.516.2−11%561 of 1,314Bureau VeritasA
2020not published29.016.2+79%1,035 of 1,312ClassNKC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.