Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VENEZIA

IMO: 9304631
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Palermo
Technical efficiency: EIV 22.74 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ALBAYZIN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

177

Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

19.9

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (−97%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1.64

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (−99%)

Average speed

16.9 kn

Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

72.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,248 t

CO₂ emitted

50,871 t

Distance sailed

91,717 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,412 h

226 days, 62% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 151 kg/nm · median 150 (+1%)

69.3Ranks 208 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 18.9 kn · median 15.8 (+20%)

12.0Faster than 76% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,356 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+139%)

66.8Ranks 351 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 79.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−69%)

48.6Ranks 72 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,088 t

6.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VENEZIA
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VENEZIA
Ro-pax median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

VENEZIA
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

VENEZIA
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.0 kn	+7%	+20%	−6%	−32%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	−4%	−13%	−11%	+44%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−6%	−10%	−6%	+9%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−0%	−2%	+30%	−44%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+4.7 kn	+1%	+33%	+24%	−21%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+8.2 kn	−17%	+81%	+513%	+17%	8.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−10.0 kn	+6%	−57%	−85%	+12,261%	10.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	16,423	51,265	108,604	5,736	18.9	151	–	–
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	16,318	50,946	115,736	6,838	16.9	141	–	–
2023	not published	19,190	59,855	130,187	6,964	18.7	147	–	–
2022	not published	21,854	68,149	138,878	7,156	19.4	157	–	–
2021	not published	16,881	52,709	106,973	5,396	19.8	158	–	–
2020	not published	13,500	42,168	86,235	5,725	15.1	157	–	–
2019	not published	2,651	8,311	14,062	2,032	6.9	189	–	–
2018	not published	16,248	50,871	91,717	5,412	16.9	177	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	1,356	567	+139%	351 of 408	79.5	253	−69%	RINA	A
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	2,004	547	+267%	366 of 404	77.0	233	−67%	RINA	A
2023	not published	1,394	680	+105%	333 of 386	76.7	234	−67%	RINA	A
2022	not published	1,281	626	+105%	329 of 394	68.0	253	−73%	RINA	A
2021	not published	2,277	815	+179%	343 of 377	76.6	226	−66%	RINA	A
2020	not published	2,888	751	+285%	358 of 387	81.5	217	−63%	RINA	A
2019	not published	2,465	569	+333%	371 of 394	87.0	223	−61%	RINA	A
2018	not published	19.9	729	−97%	47 of 361	1.64	184	−99%	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.