Navalyze · Container · Ship

XIN CHANG SHU

IMO: 9304813
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 51,693 t
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Shanghai
Technical efficiency: EIV 20.37 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 47,248 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

194

Container median 172 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−27%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

62.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,443 t

CO₂ emitted

4,502 t

Distance sailed

7,455 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

555 h

23 days, 6% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2021

Set against all 1,781 container ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 266 kg/nm · median 186 (+43%)

80.1Ranks 1,291 of 1,781, lowest first325

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 14.1 (−1%)

10.7Faster than 47% of container ships16.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.9 (−10%)

7.81Ranks 789 of 1,781, lowest first50.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU36%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

153 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

XIN CHANG SHU
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’202020’212021

Average speed, kn

XIN CHANG SHU
Container median

13.413.613.814.014.2

’202020’212021

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

XIN CHANG SHU
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’202020’212021

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+37%	+42%	+232%	+27%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 37%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2021	not published	6,577	20,672	24,732	1,774	13.9	266	16.2	–
2020	not published	1,443	4,502	7,455	555	13.4	194	12.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2021	not published	16.2	17.9	−10%	789 of 1,781	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	12.8	17.6	−27%	557 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.