Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

COTE DES FLANDRES

IMO: 9305843
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Le Havre
Technical efficiency: EEXI 26.68 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS A/S · part of DFDS

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

170

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (+11%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

940

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (+38%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

200

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−15%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

56.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,263 t

CO₂ emitted

35,077 t

Distance sailed

66,079 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,813 h

201 days, 55% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 159 kg/nm · median 150 (+6%)

69.3Ranks 237 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 15.8 (−11%)

12.0Faster than 30% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,112 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+96%)

66.8Ranks 321 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 133 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−47%)

48.6Ranks 131 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,364 t

6.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COTE DES FLANDRES
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

COTE DES FLANDRES
Ro-pax median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

COTE DES FLANDRES
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

COTE DES FLANDRES
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+2%	+1%	−8%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−8%	−6%	+6%	+5%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−7%	−16%	−8%	−26%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	+5%	+13%	−5%	+3,305%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−7%	−6%	+6%	−98%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−2%	−5%	−4%	+84%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−13%	−13%	−6%	−67%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	DFDS A/S	10,197	31,781	63,971	4,574	14.0	159	–	–
2024	DFDS A/S	10,892	34,327	69,730	4,930	14.1	156	–	–
2023	not published	11,263	35,077	66,079	4,813	13.7	170	–	–
2022	not published	13,083	40,746	71,679	4,676	15.3	183	–	–
2021	not published	13,159	40,986	75,533	5,328	14.2	174	–	–
2020	not published	13,323	41,503	71,130	5,074	14.0	187	–	–
2019	not published	14,181	44,187	74,448	5,130	14.5	191	–	–
2018	not published	17,413	54,235	79,074	5,449	14.5	220	394	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	DFDS A/S	1,112	567	+96%	321 of 408	133	253	−47%	DNV	B
2024	DFDS A/S	990	547	+81%	288 of 404	120	233	−49%	DNV	C
2023	not published	940	680	+38%	250 of 386	200	234	−15%	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	1,274	626	+103%	326 of 394	226	253	−11%	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	37.4	815	−95%	27 of 377	3.28	226	−99%	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	1,741	751	+132%	312 of 387	198	217	−9%	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	948	569	+67%	274 of 394	188	223	−15%	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	2,862	729	+293%	326 of 361	–	–	–	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.