Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ANZIO II

IMO: 9306237
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,495 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.86 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: INDEPENDENT ACCORD, CONTSHIP RUN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CONTSHIPS MANAGEMENT INC.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,495 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

101.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

43.32

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+166%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,348 t

CO₂ emitted

17,058 t

17,321 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

52,534 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,303 h

179 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 101.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−42%)

78.8Ranks 556 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 33% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 43.32 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+166%)

7.22Ranks 1,939 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports65%
From the EU13%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU7%

3% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (468 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC ANZIO II
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ANZIO II
Container median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ANZIO II
Container median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+4%	+1%	+22%	+30%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+6%	+2%	+0%	+7%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−8%	−3%	+20%	−6%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+7%	+12%	−9%	+5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+1%	−1%	+8%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+3.4 kn	+7%	+49%	+43%	−51%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+4.1 kn	−51%	−9%	+290%	−44%	4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 51%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	CONTSHIPS MANAGEMENT INC.	5,097	16,252	49,429	3,978	12.4	103.1	44.93	–
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	5,348	17,058	52,534	4,303	12.2	101.8	43.32	–
2024	CONTSHIPS MANAGEMENT INC.	4,227	13,332	43,033	3,439	12.5	98.2	33.39	–
2023	not published	3,974	12,568	42,825	3,294	13.0	92.8	31.31	–
2022	not published	3,596	11,350	35,638	2,874	12.4	100.9	33.15	–
2021	not published	3,718	11,746	39,296	3,312	11.9	94.6	31.52	–
2020	not published	3,395	10,729	36,344	2,996	12.1	93.4	33.49	–
2019	not published	2,221	6,954	25,476	2,926	8.7	87.2	68.90	–
2018	not published	1,167	3,643	6,539	1,407	4.6	178.5	122.12	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	CONTSHIPS MANAGEMENT INC.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	43.32	16.30	+166%	1,939 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	CONTSHIPS MANAGEMENT INC.	33.39	17.52	+91%	1,524 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	31.31	19.40	+61%	1,373 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	33.15	19.13	+73%	1,361 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	31.52	17.90	+76%	1,338 of 1,781	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	33.49	17.58	+91%	1,385 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	–
2019	not published	68.90	18.88	+265%	1,709 of 1,788	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	122.12	20.22	+504%	1,702 of 1,705	EnvService	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.