Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

KARADENIZ LNGT POWERSHIP ANATOLIA

IMO: 9306495
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG
Former names: PROVALYS, LNG UNITY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED · part of Synergy Marine

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

349.9 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 204.5 kg/nm (+71%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

13.86

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.39 (+88%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

97.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,454 t

CO₂ emitted

3,931 t

5,144 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

4,155 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

359 h

15 days, 4% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 349.9 kg/nm · median 204.5 (+71%)

147.8Ranks 291 of 312, lowest first328.0

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 14.6 (−21%)

11.0Faster than 13% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 13.86 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+88%)

4.54Ranks 270 of 312, lowest first17.34

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU95%
Into the EU2%
At berth in the EU3%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,021 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

41.8 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.309

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

KARADENIZ LNGT POWERSHIP ANATOLIA
LNG carrier median

0.0200.0400.0600.0800.01,000

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

KARADENIZ LNGT POWERSHIP ANATOLIA
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

KARADENIZ LNGT POWERSHIP ANATOLIA
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’202020’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+5.8 kn	−32%	+37%	−62%	−53%	5.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.3 kn	+227%	+107%	+19%	+7%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 227%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+3.0 kn	−82%	−73%	+84%	+93%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 82%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−4.5 kn	+211%	+80%	+5%	–	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 211%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.1 kn	−29%	−12%	−74%	–	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024LNG	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	1,454	3,931	4,155	359	11.6	349.9	–	–
2023LNG	not published	5,670	16,305	11,073	1,919	5.8	512.1	–	–
2022	not published	1,461	4,684	9,318	1,024	9.1	156.8	27.18	–
2020LNG	not published	4,371	12,750	5,057	823	6.1	864.3	–	61%
2019LNG	not published	1,336	3,760	4,807	452	10.6	278.0	–	–
2018LNG	not published	7,143	20,151	18,201	2,131	8.5	392.5	–	41%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	13.86	7.39	+88%	270 of 312	DNV	A+B
2023LNG	not published	29.18	9.10	+221%	337 of 355	DNV	B
2022	not published	27.18	42.53	−36%	117 of 348	DNV	B
2020LNG	not published	14.08	10.71	+31%	207 of 267	Verifavia	B+C
2019LNG	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B+C
2018LNG	not published	33.68	10.92	+208%	193 of 197	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.