Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Synergy Marineyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Synergy Marine | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 234 |
| CO₂ emitted | 2.0 Mt |
| Fuel per mile | 104 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.1 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 3.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 2 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- Synergy Marine8.4 (−52% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy Marine | 15 | 8.4 | −52% | 247 | 15.0 | 3,269 | 0.1% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Synergy Marine9.8 (+22% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy Marine | 82 | 9.8 | +22% | 105 | 11.1 | 2,404 | 7.8% | 1 |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Synergy Marine5.9 (−28% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy Marine | 77 | 5.9 | −28% | 95 | 10.9 | 1,603 | 1.5% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- Synergy Marine12.4 (−26% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy Marine | 51 | 12.4 | −26% | 77 | 11.2 | 1,528 | 0.7% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8
- Synergy Marine25.3 (−29% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy Marine | 9 | 25.3 | −29% | 102 | 9.7 | 2,712 | 5.6% | – |
| Segment median | 35.8 | 0% |
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.4
- Synergy Marine13.9 (+87% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy Marine | 1 | 13.9 | +87% | 350 | 11.6 | 359 | 2.8% | 1 |
| Segment median | 7.4 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
Synergy Marine: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KARADENIZ LNGT POWERSHIP ANATOLIALNG | 9306495 | LNG carrier | 13.9 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +87% | 11.6 | 3,931 t | €61k |
| PERTAMINA GAS AMARYLLIS | 9895317 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 25.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | +69% | 12.7 | 7,865 t | €129k |
| WHITE STAR | 9799109 | Oil tanker | 40.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +61% | 11.1 | 3,303 t | €60k |
| KMARIN RESOLUTION | 9683051 | Oil tanker | 13.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.4 | +59% | 8.5 | 2,191 t | €46k |
| GAMSUNORO | 9677313 | Oil tanker | 13.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.4 | +58% | 9.6 | 19,314 t | €366k |
| BRO ANNA | 9344435 | Oil tanker | 37.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +50% | 8.9 | 7,934 t | €157k |
| EASTERN SPIRAEA | 9909754 | Oil tanker | 35.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +41% | 9.6 | 5,332 t | €131k |
| KARADENIZ POWERSHIP AYBERK BEY | 9359600 | Chemical tanker | 56.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | +36% | 9.6 | 265 t | €0 |
| SDTR DORIS | 9877860 | Bulk carrier | 11.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +35% | 10.0 | 2,744 t | €0 |
| EASTERN NYMPHAEA | 9827994 | Oil tanker | 33.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +34% | 9.7 | 4,930 t | €82k |
| GENCO RESOLUTE | 9698977 | Bulk carrier | 6.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.9 | +31% | 10.4 | 14,401 t | €184k |
| KMARIN RIGOUR | 9683049 | Oil tanker | 8.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +31% | 9.5 | 25,152 t | €593k |
| BRO NUUK | 9323819 | Oil tanker | 32.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +28% | 9.7 | 5,869 t | €123k |
| VALERY ROMA | 9360336 | Oil tanker | 12.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | +25% | 11.7 | 6,222 t | €16k |
| PACIFIC RUBY | 9893034 | Oil tanker | 12.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | +25% | 12.2 | 4,235 t | €78k |
| SDTR GLORIA | 9877896 | Bulk carrier | 6.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.9 | +24% | 11.3 | 3,556 t | €0 |
| KMARIN RESPECT | 9683001 | Oil tanker | 7.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +22% | 10.8 | 17,119 t | €321k |
| NAVE PULSAR | 9379313 | Oil tanker | 11.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | +18% | 10.8 | 8,915 t | €158k |
| MAERSK CEBU | 9786176 | Oil tanker | 11.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | +18% | 10.8 | 2,569 t | €42k |
| MAERSK MARU | 9581447 | Oil tanker | 11.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | +17% | 11.4 | 3,102 t | €49k |
| NCC MAHA | 9387683 | Chemical tanker | 14.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | +16% | 9.4 | 1,583 t | €39k |
| TRAMMO CORNELL | 9543081 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 25.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +16% | 9.9 | 662 t | €11k |
| SEVERN | 9859234 | Oil tanker | 11.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | +13% | 11.7 | 2,595 t | €53k |
| C. GENUINE | 9929663 | Oil tanker | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +13% | 10.4 | 6,345 t | €103k |
| SOUTHERN HAWK | 9858527 | Bulk carrier | 8.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | +10% | 11.1 | 2,968 t | €47k |
| GAS AMBALAT | 9710804 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 124 g CO₂/t·nm | 114 | +9% | 6.1 | 3,159 t | €64k |
| PACIFIC PEARL | 9893072 | Oil tanker | 9.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.4 | +7% | 11.3 | 19,562 t | €329k |
| MERSEY | 9865752 | Chemical tanker | 17.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | +7% | 10.1 | 2,731 t | €42k |
| MAERSK KATE | 9431276 | Oil tanker | 26.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +6% | 11.6 | 17,299 t | €176k |
| CL LIANYUNGANG | 9747302 | Bulk carrier | 5.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.9 | +6% | 12.3 | 3,998 t | €22k |
30 of 248 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.