Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

KUDOS

IMO
9306627
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
11,482 t
Flag (estimated)
Marshall Islands
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EIV 4.25 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 42,809 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
183
Oil tanker median 140 kg/nm (+31%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
13.4
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.86 (+51%)
Average speed
8.2 kn
Oil tanker median 9.8 kn (−16%)
Fuel per day at sea
35.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
10,711 t
CO₂ emitted
33,512 t
Distance sailed
58,508 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
7,161 h
298 days, 82% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,919 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 196 kg/nm · median 138 (+42%)
82.4Ranks 1,670 of 1,919, lowest first207
Average speedThis ship 7.0 kn · median 9.7 (−28%)
6.1Faster than 19% of oil tanker ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.83 (+175%)
4.60Ranks 1,714 of 1,919, lowest first25.0
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU38%
  • Into the EU42%
  • At berth in the EU20%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
6,575 t
19.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • KUDOS
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • KUDOS
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • KUDOS
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2022+4.6 kn+200%+393%−42%–4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 200%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−1.2 kn+7%−8%−81%+82%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022not published3,74011,7186,36155011.6588160–
2019not published2,1496,71010,9731,5597.019624.3–
2018not published10,71133,51258,5087,1618.218313.4–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published––––Lloyd's RegisterB
2019not published24.38.83+175%1,714 of 1,919Lloyd's RegisterB
2018not published13.48.86+51%1,309 of 1,779Lloyd's RegisterB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.