Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SAVIR LION

IMO
9306639
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
85,122 t
Flag (estimated)
Indonesia
Port of registry
Jakarta
Technical efficiency
EIV 3.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
MAERSK PETREL, SEMBARANI
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 85,122 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
156
Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+21%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
5.84
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (−31%)
Average speed
11.2 kn
Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (+2%)
Fuel per day at sea
42.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
755 t
CO₂ emitted
2,399 t
Distance sailed
4,826 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
431 h
18 days, 5% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,797 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 156 kg/nm · median 129 (+21%)
80.4Ranks 1,351 of 1,797, lowest first193
Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 11.0 (+2%)
8.1Faster than 56% of oil tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.84 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.44 (−31%)
4.78Ranks 394 of 1,797, lowest first25.5
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU11%
  • Into the EU81%
  • At berth in the EU8%
Fuel burned laden
611 t
81% of all fuel; 19% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
192 t
8.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • SAVIR LION
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • SAVIR LION
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • SAVIR LION
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2023+0.6 kn+16%+22%−42%−3%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021−0.7 kn−23%−28%+46%−73%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.3 kn+28%+24%−80%+307%Same speed, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−1.0 kn−2%−9%−6%−0%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2023not published7552,3994,82643111.21565.8481%
2021not published1,1323,5418,37179010.61355.99–
2020not published1,0103,1685,72050711.317722.2–
2019not published3,94512,37328,6302,46511.61385.47–
2018not published4,27813,37430,4672,41912.61405.48–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published5.848.44−31%394 of 1,797ABS–
2021not published5.998.86−32%404 of 1,789ABSB+C
2020not published22.29.03+146%1,619 of 1,870ABSB+C
2019not published5.478.83−38%324 of 1,919ABSB+C
2018not published5.488.86−38%352 of 1,779ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.