Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

RALEIGH FISHER

IMO: 9306940
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 13,412 t
Flag (estimated): United Kingdom
Port of registry: London
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MAERSK RALEIGH

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: James Fisher (Shipping Services) Limited

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,466 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

76.5

Oil tanker median 131 kg/nm (−42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.51 (+44%)

Average speed

9.5 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,191 t

CO₂ emitted

13,094 t

Distance sailed

54,776 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,775 h

241 days, 66% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,797 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 83.5 kg/nm · median 129 (−35%)

80.4Ranks 228 of 1,797, lowest first193

Average speedThis ship 9.7 kn · median 11.0 (−12%)

8.1Faster than 23% of oil tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.44 (+131%)

4.78Ranks 1,531 of 1,797, lowest first25.5

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU41%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

151 t

1.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

RALEIGH FISHER
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

RALEIGH FISHER
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

RALEIGH FISHER
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	+9%	+12%	−44%	+59%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+2.4 kn	−12%	+18%	+98%	−21%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.2 kn	+19%	−9%	−44%	−59%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−17%	−14%	+3%	+35%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.0 kn	+15%	−14%	−26%	+47%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-year	James Fisher (Shipping Services) Limited	3,221	10,114	37,773	3,797	9.9	85.3	24.0	–
2023	not published	2,558	8,013	30,638	3,155	9.7	83.5	19.5	–
2022	not published	4,191	13,094	54,776	5,775	9.5	76.5	12.3	–
2021	not published	2,401	7,522	27,721	3,894	7.1	86.6	15.5	–
2020	not published	3,598	11,255	49,577	5,327	9.3	72.6	38.0	–
2019	not published	4,224	13,267	48,057	5,352	9.0	87.9	28.1	–
2018	not published	4,937	15,434	64,584	5,370	12.0	76.5	19.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	James Fisher (Shipping Services) Limited	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	19.5	8.44	+131%	1,531 of 1,797	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	12.3	8.51	+44%	1,402 of 1,961	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	15.5	8.86	+74%	1,395 of 1,789	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	38.0	9.03	+321%	1,778 of 1,870	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	28.1	8.83	+219%	1,769 of 1,919	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	19.2	8.86	+116%	1,517 of 1,779	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.