Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL DEEBEL

IMO: 9307176
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.54 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

393

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+33%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

14.1

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+31%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

140.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

24,304 t

CO₂ emitted

71,478 t

Distance sailed

61,772 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,158 h

173 days, 47% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 412 kg/nm · median 231 (+79%)

167Ranks 343 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 14.2 (+13%)

10.7Faster than 90% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 20.8 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+128%)

5.47Ranks 328 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU56%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,380 t

1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL DEEBEL
LNG carrier median

200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

AL DEEBEL
LNG carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL DEEBEL
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	+10%	+13%	−54%	+49%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+6%	+4%	+82%	+3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−10%	−4%	−36%	−4%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	−8%	+8%	+39%	−20%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.0 kn	−4%	−17%	+110%	−22%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023LNG / alt.	not published	13,520	38,398	32,791	2,051	16.0	412	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	26,977	78,398	71,983	4,645	15.5	375	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13,947	40,798	39,612	2,488	15.9	352	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	24,304	71,478	61,772	4,158	14.9	393	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	18,958	55,919	44,564	3,504	12.7	425	–	–
2018	not published	9,376	27,719	21,212	1,442	14.7	442	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG / alt.	not published	20.8	9.10	+128%	328 of 355	DNV	A+B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	13.9	10.4	+34%	281 of 379	DNV	A+B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13.5	10.5	+29%	211 of 289	DNV	A+B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	14.1	10.7	+31%	206 of 267	DNV	A+B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	17.6	10.9	+62%	216 of 248	DNV	A+B+C
2018	not published	22.7	10.9	+108%	184 of 197	DNV	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.