Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

TIMCA

IMO: 9307358
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.88 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,356 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

150

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

–

g CO₂/dwt·nm

Average speed

14.1 kn

Fuel per day at sea

50.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,529 t

CO₂ emitted

23,466 t

Distance sailed

50,305 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,577 h

149 days, 41% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 159 kg/nm · median 135 (+18%)

95.0Ranks 49 of 58, lowest first162

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.9 (+11%)

12.9Faster than 93% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 44.8 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (+351%)

4.60Ranks 54 of 58, lowest first40.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports75%
From the EU9%
Into the EU12%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

875 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TIMCA
Con-ro median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TIMCA
Con-ro median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

TIMCA
Con-ro median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−5%	−3%	+14%	−7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+12%	+20%	+55%	–	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−4%	−5%	−34%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.6 kn	−12%	−21%	+28%	+80%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+4%	+5%	−35%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+1%	+4%	+6%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−10%	−15%	−4%	–	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	14,078	43,877	88,463	5,738	15.4	159	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	13,091	40,796	77,918	5,197	15.0	168	–	–
2023	not published	7,529	23,466	50,305	3,577	14.1	150	87.1	–
2022	not published	11,951	37,240	76,792	5,369	14.3	156	–	–
2021	not published	10,612	33,068	59,900	3,759	15.9	177	–	–
2020	not published	15,720	48,982	92,543	5,848	15.8	170	–	–
2019	not published	14,680	45,750	87,067	5,674	15.3	169	38.6	–
2018	not published	17,131	53,392	91,105	5,601	16.3	188	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	44.8	9.92	+351%	54 of 58	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	48.2	9.36	+415%	61 of 64	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	67.6	21.6	+213%	987 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	37.5	22.7	+65%	984 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	39.2	24.5	+60%	967 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	45.1	24.9	+81%	875 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.