Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

KRAFTCA

IMO: 9307360
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.02 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

180

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

15.7 kn

Fuel per day at sea

67.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,939 t

CO₂ emitted

49,658 t

Distance sailed

88,666 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,630 h

235 days, 64% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 139 kg/nm · median 135 (+3%)

95.0Ranks 33 of 58, lowest first162

Average speedThis ship 15.0 kn · median 13.9 (+8%)

12.9Faster than 90% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 46.8 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (+372%)

4.60Ranks 56 of 58, lowest first40.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports88%
From the EU4%
Into the EU4%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,245 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KRAFTCA
Con-ro median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KRAFTCA
Con-ro median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KRAFTCA
Con-ro median

0.025.050.075.0100

’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−14%	−11%	−9%	+2%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+6%	+6%	−4%	−37%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−12%	−14%	−0%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.5 kn	−3%	+8%	+6%	–	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.7 kn	+9%	−9%	−20%	–	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−5%	+4%	+10%	–	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−5%	−11%	−2%	–	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	9,809	30,559	70,434	4,703	15.0	139	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	12,496	38,938	77,565	5,307	14.6	161	–	–
2023	not published	12,220	38,081	80,601	5,519	14.6	152	72.9	–
2022	not published	13,913	43,348	80,831	5,388	15.0	172	–	–
2021	not published	13,505	42,073	76,320	5,639	13.5	177	–	–
2020	not published	15,490	48,257	95,081	5,874	16.2	163	–	–
2019	not published	14,854	46,277	86,595	5,882	14.7	172	–	–
2018	not published	15,939	49,658	88,666	5,630	15.7	180	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	46.8	9.92	+372%	56 of 58	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	45.9	9.36	+390%	57 of 64	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	72.9	93.5	−22%	50 of 116	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.