Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

GENCA

IMO: 9307372
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.44 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

145

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

16.8 kn

Fuel per day at sea

58.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,588 t

CO₂ emitted

39,232 t

Distance sailed

86,852 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,175 h

216 days, 59% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 138 kg/nm · median 135 (+2%)

95.0Ranks 32 of 58, lowest first162

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 13.9 (+13%)

12.9Faster than 98% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 44.0 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (+343%)

4.60Ranks 53 of 58, lowest first40.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU0%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,919 t

7.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GENCA
Con-ro median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GENCA
Con-ro median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GENCA
Con-ro median

0.050.0100150

’202020’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−8%	−7%	+10%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.8 kn	+6%	+20%	+3%	−49%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.1 kn	−3%	−21%	−7%	–	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−4%	−10%	−9%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+0%	+2%	+1%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+2%	+5%	+10%	–	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	+1%	−0%	−13%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	12,640	39,384	91,850	5,866	15.7	138	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	12,432	38,748	83,214	5,380	15.5	149	–	–
2023	not published	11,424	35,599	80,953	5,918	13.7	141	88.3	–
2022	not published	12,588	39,232	86,852	5,175	16.8	145	–	–
2021	not published	14,327	44,645	95,054	5,297	17.9	151	–	–
2020	not published	14,107	43,960	93,869	5,331	17.6	150	43.6	–
2019	not published	12,551	39,115	85,347	5,007	17.0	147	–	–
2018	not published	14,300	44,559	97,897	5,690	17.2	146	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	44.0	9.92	+343%	53 of 58	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	45.3	9.36	+384%	56 of 64	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	88.3	93.5	−6%	55 of 116	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	43.6	121	−64%	23 of 81	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.