Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

TRICA

IMO: 9307384
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.14 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

170

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

15.2 kn

Fuel per day at sea

61.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,206 t

CO₂ emitted

44,260 t

Distance sailed

83,548 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,509 h

230 days, 63% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 162 kg/nm · median 135 (+20%)

95.0Ranks 52 of 58, lowest first162

Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 13.9 (+12%)

12.9Faster than 97% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 45.9 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (+363%)

4.60Ranks 55 of 58, lowest first40.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports76%
From the EU14%
Into the EU7%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,346 t

3.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TRICA
Con-ro median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TRICA
Con-ro median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TRICA
Con-ro median

0.050.0100150

’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+8%	+12%	+3%	−0%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+4%	+1%	−11%	−34%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−14%	−13%	+16%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−1%	−0%	−7%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+2.3 kn	+1%	+19%	+4%	–	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.9 kn	−1%	−19%	−14%	–	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−5%	−3%	+5%	–	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	13,457	41,961	83,124	5,338	15.6	162	–	–
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	12,098	37,701	80,325	5,396	14.9	151	–	–
2023	not published	13,063	40,708	89,785	5,867	15.3	146	69.1	–
2022	not published	13,092	40,804	77,444	5,092	15.2	169	68.5	–
2021	not published	14,206	44,260	83,548	5,509	15.2	170	–	–
2020	not published	13,602	42,378	80,564	6,252	12.9	169	42.5	–
2019	not published	15,905	49,552	93,734	5,934	15.8	170	–	–
2018	not published	15,955	49,710	88,926	5,746	15.5	179	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	45.9	9.92	+363%	55 of 58	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoffs Bevrachtingskantoor B.V.	46.0	9.36	+391%	58 of 64	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	69.1	93.5	−26%	46 of 116	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	68.5	74.1	−8%	33 of 78	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	42.5	121	−65%	22 of 81	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.