Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC SILVANA

IMO: 9309459
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 67,970 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.57 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 61,654 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

289

Container median 182 kg/nm (+59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−28%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

97.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,766 t

CO₂ emitted

55,423 t

Distance sailed

61,403 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,361 h

182 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 250 kg/nm · median 165 (+52%)

77.6Ranks 1,487 of 1,899, lowest first291

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 13.2 (+14%)

10.0Faster than 86% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (−40%)

7.34Ranks 501 of 1,899, lowest first51.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU48%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,707 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC SILVANA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

MSC SILVANA
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC SILVANA
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−3.3 kn	−6%	−23%	+551%	−52%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.1 kn	−14%	+4%	−71%	+89%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.7 kn	−10%	−23%	−36%	−18%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	+8%	+20%	−43%	−1%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.2 kn	+8%	+25%	−4%	+8%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	10,194	32,155	40,747	2,706	15.1	250	11.6	–
2022	not published	1,659	5,234	6,263	340	18.4	265	24.3	–
2021	not published	6,649	20,978	21,675	1,417	15.3	307	12.8	–
2020	not published	11,466	36,161	33,800	1,873	18.0	339	15.6	–
2019	not published	18,431	57,512	58,817	3,613	16.3	313	15.8	–
2018	not published	17,766	55,423	61,403	4,361	14.1	289	14.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	11.6	19.4	−40%	501 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	24.3	19.1	+27%	1,122 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	12.8	17.9	−28%	531 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	15.6	17.6	−11%	769 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	15.8	18.9	−17%	701 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	14.6	20.2	−28%	534 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.