Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

HOEGH DETROIT

IMO: 9312470
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 10,079 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.45 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hoegh Autoliners Management AS

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,436 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

124

Vehicle carrier median 103 kg/nm (+20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

42.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 56.6 (−25%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.5 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,305 t

CO₂ emitted

21,209 t

Distance sailed

59,172 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,959 h

165 days, 45% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 108 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+8%)

79.6Ranks 374 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 14.3 kn · median 14.4 (−1%)

12.0Faster than 47% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (−39%)

34.7Ranks 42 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU31%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

598 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HOEGH DETROIT
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HOEGH DETROIT
Vehicle carrier median

13.013.514.014.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HOEGH DETROIT
Vehicle carrier median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+5%	+3%	+23%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−17%	−19%	−51%	−18%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	+9%	+23%	+548%	−8%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+3%	−3%	−58%	+11%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−5%	−2%	+230%	−36%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−4%	−2%	−47%	+47%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−10%	−17%	−48%	−33%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	3,878	12,173	35,943	2,521	14.3	108	33.6	–
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	3,010	9,429	29,287	2,013	14.5	103	34.9	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7,305	21,209	59,172	3,959	14.9	124	42.5	–
2022	not published	1,037	3,267	9,125	690	13.2	114	46.2	–
2021	not published	2,423	7,591	21,903	1,565	14.0	111	41.8	–
2020	not published	773	2,437	6,640	491	13.5	116	65.2	–
2019	not published	1,528	4,788	12,601	955	13.2	121	44.3	–
2018	not published	3,287	10,280	24,396	1,697	14.4	135	65.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	33.6	55.4	−39%	42 of 506	DNV	B+C
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	34.9	55.3	−37%	21 of 335	DNV	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	42.5	56.6	−25%	75 of 417	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	46.2	57.7	−20%	113 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	41.8	59.6	−30%	52 of 459	DNV	A
2020	not published	65.2	57.3	+14%	277 of 449	DNV	A
2019	not published	44.3	59.0	−25%	48 of 426	DNV	A
2018	not published	65.7	62.4	+5%	243 of 434	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.