Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

HOEGH SHANGHAI

IMO: 9312482
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 8,925 t
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.43 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hoegh Autoliners Management AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,925 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

97.6 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.19

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (−38%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,044 t

CO₂ emitted

9,519 t

9,668 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,194 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,154 h

90 days, 25% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 97.6 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−2%)

79.6Ranks 218 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 14.4 (+1%)

12.0Faster than 52% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.19 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (−38%)

34.70Ranks 48 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU22%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU3%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,385 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HOEGH SHANGHAI
Vehicle carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HOEGH SHANGHAI
Vehicle carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HOEGH SHANGHAI
Vehicle carrier median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.2 kn	−14%	+1%	+10%	−43%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−7%	−12%	+51%	+25%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+11%	+0%	−53%	+40%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	−2%	−9%	+247%	−32%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.7 kn	+14%	+28%	−38%	+16%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	−25%	−18%	+29%	−1%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−8%	−7%	−49%	−27%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	3,044	9,519	31,194	2,154	14.5	97.6	34.19	–
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	3,211	10,075	28,260	2,289	12.3	113.6	60.34	–
2023	not published	2,278	7,135	18,691	1,431	13.1	121.9	48.40	–
2022	not published	4,420	13,717	40,170	2,781	14.4	110.0	34.57	–
2021	not published	1,297	4,061	11,582	742	15.6	112.0	51.11	–
2020	not published	1,852	5,812	18,811	1,353	13.9	98.4	44.02	–
2019	not published	1,907	5,972	14,569	1,138	12.8	130.9	44.68	–
2018	not published	4,072	12,747	28,471	2,250	12.7	143.0	60.81	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	34.19	55.36	−38%	48 of 506	DNV	B+C
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	60.34	55.31	+9%	192 of 335	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	48.40	56.64	−15%	131 of 417	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	34.57	57.66	−40%	17 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	51.11	59.57	−14%	147 of 459	DNV	A
2020	not published	44.02	57.26	−23%	86 of 449	DNV	A
2019	not published	44.68	58.95	−24%	51 of 426	DNV	A
2018	not published	60.81	62.35	−2%	203 of 434	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.