Navalyze · Container · Ship

NYK VENUS

IMO: 9312793
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 67,159 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 74,799 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

272

Container median 172 kg/nm (+58%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−35%)

Average speed

17.7 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+26%)

Fuel per day at sea

115.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,441 t

CO₂ emitted

58,129 t

Distance sailed

67,695 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,818 h

159 days, 44% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 224 kg/nm · median 177 (+26%)

78.8Ranks 1,433 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 13.3 (+5%)

9.1Faster than 60% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−37%)

7.22Ranks 603 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU46%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,471 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NYK VENUS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NYK VENUS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NYK VENUS
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	−8%	−13%	−29%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	+6%	−1%	+23%	–	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−9%	−10%	+61%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.9 kn	−8%	−18%	−25%	−7%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+1%	+3%	−31%	+3%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	−5%	−6%	+23%	−5%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−2%	+0%	−18%	−13%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	11,036	34,132	49,342	3,528	14.0	224	10.3	–
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	16,868	52,595	69,448	4,667	14.9	243	–	–
2023	not published	12,951	40,827	56,457	3,547	15.9	229	10.5	–
2022	not published	8,883	27,995	35,163	2,186	16.1	253	11.0	–
2021	not published	12,952	40,815	46,936	2,614	18.0	276	11.8	–
2020	not published	18,441	58,129	67,695	3,818	17.7	272	11.5	–
2019	not published	15,725	49,005	54,880	3,048	18.0	287	12.1	–
2018	not published	19,577	60,974	66,924	3,796	17.6	293	13.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	10.3	16.3	−37%	603 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	10.5	19.4	−46%	425 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	11.0	19.1	−42%	402 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	11.8	17.9	−34%	451 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	11.5	17.6	−35%	474 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	12.1	18.9	−36%	451 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	13.9	20.2	−31%	489 of 1,705	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.