Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

BALTIC FULMAR

IMO
9313204
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
8,524 t
Flag (estimated)
Cyprus
Port of registry
Limassol
Technical efficiency
EIV 37.27 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA Super
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,184 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
121
Container median 182 kg/nm (−33%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
37.6
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+86%)
Average speed
8.5 kn
Container median 13.8 kn (−38%)
Fuel per day at sea
24.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
6,390 t
CO₂ emitted
20,186 t
Distance sailed
52,701 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
6,189 h
258 days, 71% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 105 kg/nm · median 178 (−41%)
77.9Ranks 496 of 1,825, lowest first314
Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 13.6 (−10%)
10.1Faster than 31% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 38.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.1 (+102%)
7.44Ranks 1,465 of 1,825, lowest first52.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports63%
  • From the EU15%
  • Into the EU14%
  • At berth in the EU8%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,655 t
8.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • BALTIC FULMAR
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • BALTIC FULMAR
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BALTIC FULMAR
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2022−1.0 kn−8%−14%−5%+23%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+1.5 kn+3%+16%−4%+1%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+1.3 kn−5%+7%−0%−9%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+2.0 kn−4%+17%−7%−9%2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022not published4,67614,68244,4733,62412.310538.7–
2021not published5,31316,73446,7343,52513.311431.5–
2020not published5,36416,93948,7524,12211.811031.2–
2019not published5,68217,84948,9884,68510.511634.4–
2018not published6,39020,18652,7016,1898.512137.6–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published38.719.1+102%1,465 of 1,825Korean RegisterA
2021not published31.517.9+76%1,339 of 1,781Korean RegisterA
2020not published31.217.6+77%1,355 of 1,797DNVB+C
2019not published34.418.9+82%1,337 of 1,788DNVB+C
2018not published37.620.2+86%1,304 of 1,705DNVB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.