Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

ANWAAR AL KHALIJ

IMO: 9313424
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 11,145 t
Flag (estimated): Libya
Port of registry: Derna
Technical efficiency: EIV 8.92 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: General National Maritime Transport Company

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,566 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

113

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (+232%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

679 t

CO₂ emitted

2,124 t

Distance sailed

6,035 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

590 h

25 days, 7% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 92.3 kg/nm · median 129 (−28%)

76.1Ranks 341 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 7.5 kn · median 10.7 (−30%)

8.0Faster than 7% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 26.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+230%)

4.51Ranks 1,480 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU60%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

407 t

60% of all fuel; 40% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

140 t

6.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANWAAR AL KHALIJ
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ANWAAR AL KHALIJ
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ANWAAR AL KHALIJ
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−9%	−2%	+57%	−1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.2 kn	−10%	−38%	+23%	−5%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+4.8 kn	+1%	+93%	−33%	+2%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−6.4 kn	+32%	−40%	−39%	+19%	6.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	−21%	−16%	+48%	−16%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.0 kn	−3%	+33%	−32%	−7%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.8 kn	−5%	−23%	+521%	+30%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	General National Maritime Transport Company	1,074	3,401	11,627	1,546	7.5	92.3	26.3	–
2024	General National Maritime Transport Company	755	2,363	7,408	1,059	7.0	102	26.5	95%
2023	not published	679	2,124	6,035	590	10.2	113	28.0	60%
2022	not published	1,008	3,152	9,068	1,689	5.4	111	27.4	56%
2021	not published	1,246	3,893	14,818	1,261	11.8	84.1	23.0	41%
2020	not published	1,069	3,341	10,031	908	11.0	107	27.3	49%
2019	not published	1,620	5,068	14,718	1,834	8.0	110	29.2	45%
2018	not published	276	862	2,370	241	9.8	117	22.5	72%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	General National Maritime Transport Company	26.3	7.95	+230%	1,480 of 1,665	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	General National Maritime Transport Company	26.5	8.06	+229%	1,615 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	28.0	8.44	+232%	1,642 of 1,797	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	27.4	8.51	+222%	1,796 of 1,961	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	23.0	8.86	+160%	1,573 of 1,789	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	27.3	9.03	+202%	1,702 of 1,870	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	29.2	8.83	+231%	1,787 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	22.5	8.86	+154%	1,582 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.