Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

PEONIA

IMO: 9313436
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 15,162 t
Port of registry: Venezia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.48 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Marwave Shipmanagement Srl

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,162 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

83.9 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.45

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+16%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,451 t

CO₂ emitted

7,733 t

7,854 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

29,228 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,620 h

109 days, 30% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 83.9 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+5%)

52.8Ranks 837 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 11.1 (+1%)

8.8Faster than 51% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.45 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+16%)

7.93Ranks 845 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports38%
From the EU13%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU14%

76% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,882 t).

Fuel burned laden

67%

33% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

14.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PEONIA
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PEONIA
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PEONIA
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	−22%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+9%	+6%	−4%	+33%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	−33%	−24%	+42%	−59%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 33%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.8 kn	−7%	+28%	−2%	−11%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−14%	−21%	+17%	−1%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	+1%	+27%	−19%	+10%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+4%	+8%	−9%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Marwave Shipmanagement Srl	2,451	7,733	29,228	2,620	11.2	83.9	17.45	67%
2024	Marwave Shipmanagement Srl	3,048	9,585	37,416	3,316	11.3	81.5	18.69	67%
2023	not published	2,907	9,119	38,844	3,349	11.6	74.8	14.10	77%
2022	not published	3,045	9,553	27,392	2,678	10.2	111.2	34.18	48%
2021	not published	3,358	10,630	28,056	3,766	7.4	119.7	38.31	38%
2020	not published	3,347	10,603	23,946	2,977	8.0	139.8	38.63	–
2019	not published	4,103	12,889	29,574	4,652	6.4	138.7	35.05	–
2018	not published	4,324	13,563	32,563	5,287	6.2	132.8	36.73	51%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Marwave Shipmanagement Srl	17.45	15.04	+16%	845 of 1,460	ABS	A
2024	Marwave Shipmanagement Srl	18.69	16.73	+12%	727 of 1,274	ABS	A
2023	not published	14.10	16.23	−13%	531 of 1,314	RINA	A
2022	not published	34.18	16.06	+113%	1,189 of 1,409	RINA	A
2021	not published	38.31	16.69	+130%	1,179 of 1,343	RINA	A
2020	not published	38.63	16.16	+139%	1,160 of 1,312	ABS	A
2019	not published	35.05	17.32	+102%	1,112 of 1,321	ABS	A
2018	not published	36.73	17.14	+114%	1,093 of 1,294	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.